Buy WaterRower Oxbridge Rowing Machine in Cherry with S4 MonitorWaterRower Oxbridge Rowing Machine in Cherry with S4 Monitor Product Description:
- Handcrafted rowing machine with "water flywheel" that replicates actual rowing feel
- Flywheel sits in enclosed water tank to provide smooth, quiet, self-regulated resistance
- Series 4 performance monitor tracks workout intensity, stroke rate, heart rate, and more
- Solid cherry wood construction absorbs sound and vibration; hand finished in Danish oil
- Stores upright; measures 84 x 21 x 22 inches (W x H x D) and weighs 117 pounds
Product Description
The WaterRower Oxbridge is handcrafted from solid Cherry wood, finished with danish oil. The WaterRower's patented WaterFlywheel has been specifically designed to emulate the dynamics of a boat moving though water and is unsurpassed in its simulation of the physical and physiological benefits of rowing.
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
30 of 30 people found the following review helpful.
Perfect Machine
By J. Grant
I don't know where to begin. I researched many types of exercise equipment and this one takes the cake. Check the manufacturer's well-built site for all the details on the product. I picked the cherry model for looks, but I'm sure any model would have suited my fitness needs. This rower is rock-solid, whisper quiet, comfortable and beautifully designed. When standing against a wall it looks like a piece of art. But it doesn't stay there long. My wife and I use it everyday. The resistance and motion is so smooth! I can't recommend this machine enough. You can even buy software to race other WaterRowers online. If you are really serious about an aerobic workout, look no further. The WaterRower is worth every penny and built to last.
28 of 29 people found the following review helpful.
Water Rower and Concept 2
By DM
I own 2 rowers in 2 different locations:1st is a Concept 2 (model C - computer upgraded to PM3, handle and seat from D) which is just over 10 years old at my office/shop.2nd is the Water Rower in Cherry which is just over 6 months old at my vacation house (used every weekend).I write this review just having finished rowing on the Water Rower.I purchased both machine new.In the past, I had a "silicon filled piston super heavy duty rowing machine" which just died of many wear and fatigue problems before I purchased the Concept.Either the Concept or Water Rower will do a really good job of lasting and keeping you in shape without killing your body.I ran for many years but it was doing slow damage to my knees so I moved to rowing.I row 3 days on, 1 off unless I get a major workout some other way.I use these machines to keep in shape. Keep the lungs and heart moving etc.I just get on the machine and row for 30 minutes either watching TV (at office) or listening to a pod caste and looking at the ocean.I do not use any monitor graphics or other features.I want 3 things - total time rowed - total meters rowed - current time for 500 M.To me the rest of the displays are just not interesting.I own and might use a heart rate monitor every 6 months are so...The concept has > 10 million meters on it.Replaced some parts over the years - the grips wears out fairly fast and the original was poorly shaped (for my hands) but the D model is good. The chain and shock cord has been replaced 2 times. Multiple seat roller sets. Complete seat.The significant maintenance issue is you must wipe down the rollers and clean the rail with every use. If you do not do this it will not be smooth and drive you crazy. I keep paper towels and a wetting squirt bottle next to the machine. You can expect to use one half a paper towel per row if you want a smooth machine. The seat rollers need to be replaced on a regular basis - they give off some black material all the time. Concept keeps changing the material of the rollers so maybe they will find a good solution.The Concept PM2 monitor was changed to a PM3 monitor which was a gift. The PM3 might have been an upgrade in some ways but effectively deleted the long term total of the PM2. When the batteries die my PM3 often loses info which the PM2 did not. This does not affect me much but might be a large issue for many users.The design of the battery holder makes me sad every time I replace the batteries.Card workout storage system is not something I use so no info on that.The worst part of the Concept is it is very loud - I have to turn the TV up to dead max and can barely understand it.The machine + TV is so loud I normally try and wait till the business next door leaves before I row - subjecting someone to equipment noise is ok but to bad TV just seems so rude...Originally I expected to purchase a Concept D for my vacation house having talked several friends into buying one.But I was concerned with rust since there is a lot of salt in the air at the vacation house. The Concept has developed few spots of rust in it's current location so I knew this was going to be a big issue.The Water Rower has some steel parts also but is mostly wood so I figured this was a plus.The Water Rower also looks much better which was a plus - who cares in my shop but this is now in a home.And the Water Rower looks way better standing up - the Concept looks like it will fall (never has) and hurt you. In theory, the Concept can be split into 2 pieces but this is a pain in the butt for an everyday operation.So I purchased the Water Rower in cherry...The Water Rower has about 600 KM on it to date.Water Rower good points:Looks great.Very quite.Smoother stroke.No issues with rails - this is surprise to me - I even talked to Water Rower directly about the rails and wear etc. Looked like a iffy solution - works great.Feels more stable - the Concept is fine - the Water Rower is even better.Computer is better than I expected given the comments on Amazon.Rust has not been an issue so far - there are some steel parts but the coating must be really good.The handle is better - at first I expected to replace the handle with a Concept model D version but then I found I just forgot about it - so it works.Seat is better - women seem to find it significantly so.Things which could be improved:The rollers on the front to moving around the machine need work - Water Rower needs to make a spacer to make them better fit the holes. Easy fix but needed.The overlay on my monitor needed to be positioned better (caught buttons down) - and then fell off - easy to reapply but a quality issue. As a note to water rower - make your cut outs bigger next time by at least 0.010" - will save you and users some grief.Publish data on freezing prevention - I am technical and can figure out the ratio of Isopropyl for my needs but users need support.Finish - Danish oil would be a nice option - it just makes it look much richer than the stock finish.Foot straps - not quite great yet if you use socks or less - foot straps for wind surfers etc would be great optional upgrade.More differences for the Water Rower vs. Concept:The stroke is very different and many believe the Water Rower is incorrect on work expended.I am not convinced - the Water Rower stroke has more resistance at first and less at the end.The Water Rower is also less affected by a varying rate - it is fairly easy to "cheat" on the Concept. If I row X meters in 30 minutes on both - I feel different but my sweet level and guess at work expended is very close with a slight increase on the Water Rower.Not sure why either machine would be less than accurate - fairly easy to calculate.So in the end if I was just going to purchase 1 machine again it would be the Water Rower hands down.But for now I will keep rowing on both....
18 of 19 people found the following review helpful.
Amazing Piece of Art, er, Exercise Equipment
By Stephon Devante
Anyone considering this rower should know first and foremost that it is absolutely gorgeous. Beyond that, what really sold me over the Concept 2 is that the layout of the machine is more conducive to rowing while watching tv, for example, nearly silent (great for apartment living), and what you noise you do hear is the gentle whoosh of water swirling.I've never rowed in a scull, but I have to imagine the WaterRower sounds much more realistic than the sawing sound of the Concept 2.Storage is a breeze with the low center of gravity and roller wheels - just lift it up and it takes up about the space of a dining chair.The only potential downside is the computer. The Concept 2 has very accurate drag calculations, etc., that allow you to compare against anybody else's scores in the world. The S4 monitor on the WaterRower, by contrast, is not nearly as sophisticated. It doesn't even tell you total calories burned, which is a bummer. Despite some of the shortcomings of the monitor, however, I found that it was suitable for my intended purpose - exercise. I am not trying to become an Olympic rower, but merely lose some weight. For that purpose, I think the monitor is going to work out just fine.(As an aside, the WaterRower company does offer a usb connector so you can hook up the rower to your computer and do some online things. It was complicated to figure out, at least on a Mac (looks more straightforward for Windows computers), but once I got it set up, it was kinda cool to race against a pace boat. Allegedly you can also race real people around the world, but the room was empty when I tried it out.)In the end, this is a lot of money but it's a gorgeous piece of equipment that still manages to get your heart rate up. Is it better than the Concept 2? I guess that depends on your needs/wants. For me, near silent operation and beautiful presentation was more important. And if you do go the WaterRower route, may I suggest spending the extra coin for a fancier wood model. I've seen a demo unit in the Natural, and while beautiful, the Oxbridge model I bought in Cherry is amazing. Don't go by the stock Amazon picture, it looks nothing like the real thing. I'll try to post some pictures tonight.Thanks for reading!
See all 15 customer reviews...Latest Price:
See on Amazon.com!
More Info:
See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review:
See on Amazon.com!
Buy Happy Mouth Jointed Full Cheek Bit 5
Good but not perfect
Poor Quality Clipper
